JR's Blog

Contained herein are the random travels of an Army officer. I'm assigned to the Special Troops Battalion of the 1st Sustainment Brigade (formerly the 1st Infantry Division Support Command or DISCOM). I have an MS in Logistics Management ('03 Florida Tech) and have earned the title of Certified Professional Logistician (CPL) from the International Society of Logistics. I'm married to a wonderful woman and blessed with fraternal twin daughters and a son.

My Photo
Name:
Location: Martin, TN, United States

I'm a mild-mannered logistician by day and an evil libertarian by night.

Sunday, February 20, 2005

Old Glory = Street Gang Colors?

This is really sad. On one hand, pre-teens are free to run around with their underwear sticking out in public schools, but God forbid one shows a little patriotism. I wonder what school officials would say if a student wore a red, white, and blue thong to class?

Colorful beads lead to court
Student claims Schenectady school district cannot ban her red, white and blue necklace

By MICHELE MORGAN BOLTON, Times Union Staff writer First published: Thursday, February 17, 2005

ALBANY -- A Mont Pleasant middle school student is taking her freedom-of-expression fight to federal court, claiming Schenectady school officials have no right to ban her from wearing a handmade red, white and blue necklace to class.


The beads, which Raven Furbert got as a string-it-yourself Christmas gift, symbolize love of country and respect for soldiers serving in Iraq, according to the lawsuit her mother, Katie Grzywna, filed in U.S. District Court in Albany.

Among those soldiers is her uncle, J. Barnes, who is a member of the Army National Guard's 42nd Rainbow Division, and three other relatives. Barnes shipped out to Kuwait in October, and went on active duty in Iraq the first week in January.

Raven, 12, made the necklace over the Christmas vacation and wore it on her first day back to school on Jan. 4. She said it was to commemorate Barnes' move into a danger zone and that it is her way of trying to protect him.

She said she can't understand what the big deal is. "I just want to wear them for my uncle," she said. "I'll be really glad when this is all over."


Schenectady school officials immediately banned her from displaying her unique neckwear in a belief such "gang-related" jewelry violates policy, court papers alleged.

Monday, February 14, 2005

The National Debt

I did a little research on the National Debt. The Dept of the Treasury website (especially the bureau known as the Financial Management Service) has a bunch of great information about this thing politicians talk about – yet most folks haven’t the slightest clue about.

By the end of Dec ’04 the National Debt was $7.6 trillion. Of this, $4.4 trillion consisted of marketable securities (bonds, T-bills, etc.) and the remaining $3.2 trillion was composed of intergovernmental holdings.

I think there’s a general misconception about how much of the National Debt is “owned” by foreign governments. While it is true that China is the second-largest holder of U.S. debt at somewhere between $175-200 billion, this is a paltry sum in comparison to Japan, which holds in the neighborhood of $700 billion. But let’s put this into perspective:


- About 24% of the National Debt is foreign-owned.

- The Chinese Central Bank owns about 11% of all foreign-owned US debt or about 2% of the entire public debt.

Other Facts

- The Gross Domestic Product for 2004 was about $11.7 trillion. Treasury Department Gross Tax Collections for 2003 totaled $1.88 trillion.

- Federal outlays totaled $2.29 trillion, which put last year’s federal budget deficit at $412.1 billion.

- 19.8% of federal outlays or $454 billion went to defense.

- $1.2 trillion or 52% of last year’s federal outlays went to entitlement programs (

- It’s estimated that the public debt grows at a rate of $1 billion each day. The GDP increased by roughly 6% last year, which amounts to $2 billion each day.

- Bill Gates’ wealth is accumulating at a rate of 29% annually. If this continues, he’ll be a trillionaire by 2018.

Friday, February 11, 2005

Attention Fellow Logisticians

Besides pithy observations about politics and society in general, I'm also going to start talking a little more about logistics, since it's one of the few subjects I can discuss with some expertise.

I recently received a call and then an e-mail (see excerpt below) from Bob Dalton, an AKO Tool Developer Users Group (TDUG) Administrator. Anyway, I'm very impressed with what he showed me. See for yourself:

Here are clickable links to our Army Organization Groups on AKO for those of you having problems locating us. Just click them while logged onto AKO and it will take you to that site.

Be sure to click the "Bookmark" icon once you are there to make it easier to get here next time. Please pass this information onto others.

PowerPoint Central contains over 700 Microsoft PowerPoint Presentations, briefing and training classes on virtually everything of interest at the Brigade and below levels. The eighteenth most popular group Army wide on AKO with over 160,000 downloads to date! https://www.us.army.mil/suite/portal.do?$p=446

SOP Central contains over 200 example SOPs on virtually everything you can imagine and all in Microsoft Word format for easy editing. The fifty ninth most popular group Army wide on AKO with over 50,000 downloads to date!https://www.us.army.mil/suite/portal.do?$p=521

Tool Central contains over 440 military specific software tools of all types. Over 240 Military Excel spreadsheets alone! It is also the only place you can find the entire Digital Logistics freeware military software collection on the Internet! These 30+ state of the art professionally done military software tools cover training, logistics, operations and many other areas. The seventh most popular group Army wide on AKO with over 400,000 downloads to date!https://www.us.army.mil/suite/portal.do?$p=424

TDUG Main Site: This is the parent group and main entry point site for all of the above. The TDUG site also provides encouragement and a technical forum for soldiers wanting to develop software tools of all types of their own. https://www.us.army.mil/suite/portal.do?$p=229

We highly recommend that you first consider downloading and reviewing the TDUG User Guide, which contains just about everything you need to know about any of the above groups and there files. To do so just click the following link: https://mail.jdp.us.army.mil/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=https://www.us.army.mil/suite/doc/1263562

Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Hillary Takes a Stand

I've really got to hand it to Senator Hillary Clinton. She's demonstrating great tenacity in embracing the middle-path, which incidentally is what her husband did to get into the White House. Take as evidence her recent statements about the elections in Iraq.

Wall Street Journal
February 3, 2005 Pg. 16
The 'Exit Strategy' Democrats

Every so often, an American politician takes an unpopular stand for the sake of what's right: Think of Gerald Ford's pardon of Richard Nixon. Frequently, he takes an unprincipled stand for the sake of what's popular: Take Richard Nixon's price controls. Sometimes, even, he does what's
right, which also happens to be popular: Ronald Reagan's bombing of Libya.

Only in the rarest of instances, however, do politicians take positions that are both unpopular and unprincipled. That is where the Democratic Party leadership finds itself today on Iraq.

On Sunday, some eight million Iraqi citizens risked their lives to participate in parliamentary elections -- as vivid and moving a demonstration of democratic ideals in action as we've seen in our lifetimes. Whereupon Senate Democrats Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry took to the airwaves to explain that it was no big deal and that it was time to start casting about for an "exit strategy."

Mr. Kerry: "No one in the United States should try to overhype this election.... It's hard to say that something is legitimate when a whole portion of the country can't and doesn't vote."


Mr. Kennedy: "While the elections are a step forward, they are not a cure for the growing violence and resentment of the perception of American occupation. ... The best way to demonstrate to the Iraqi people that we have no long-term designs on their country is for the
Administration to withdraw some troops now..."

Minority Leader Reid: "We need an exit strategy so that we know what victory is and how we can get there. ... Iraq is clearly important, but there are so many bigger threats to our national
security..."

So what is the Democratic Party's message on this inspiring exercise in Iraqi self-determination?

First, that the election's legitimacy is questionable. Second, that its effects will be minor. Third, that America's presence in Iraq is doing more harm than good by generating terrorism and anti-Americanism where none previously existed. Fourth, that the U.S. has better things to do. Fifth, that American sacrifices in Iraq are best redeemed not by victory, but by the earliest feasible departure.

As a matter of policy, this is a manifesto for irresponsibility. Just as the postponement of elections would have been a gift to the insurgents, a timetable for withdrawal now would amount to a concession of defeat. The Iraqis certainly know this, with interim President (and Sunni Arab) Sheik Ghazi al-Yawar saying Tuesday that it is "complete nonsense to ask the troops to leave in this chaos and this vacuum of power." The claim that the U.S. has become a force for occupation only validates the Al-Jazeera hypothesis that the terrorists are engaging in a legitimate exercise in "resistance."

What is more astonishing, however, is the Democrats' political tone-deafness. In their indictment of Administration policy, the Senators always take care to add a few words of tribute to the American soldier. But what's the point of praising his courage when only a fool would want to be the last man to die for a mistake?

Today, the Democratic Party has put itself in the awkward position of hoping to gain political advantage in the 2006 elections as a result of American wartime reverses, just as some House Republicans did during the war in Kosovo (they were saved by their Senate betters). This is not a place any political party should wish to be.

We understand that it is in the nature of the party of opposition to oppose. But there's no law in politics that says opposition has to be blind.


Following the Iraqi election, Senator Hillary Clinton offered that "we have to salute the courage and bravery of those who are risking their lives to vote and those brave Iraqi and American soldiers fighting to protect their right to vote. They are facing terrorists who have declared war on democracy itself and made voting a life-and-death process." Last we checked, nobody had accused Mrs. Clinton of being a Republican.

At the onset of the Cold War, and despite opposition from the isolationist wing of their party, Arthur Vandenberg and other Republican Senators worked with Democratic President Harry Truman to forge the containment strategy against Communism. Where is today's Democratic Vandenberg?


Monday, February 07, 2005

Exodus to Canada?

News like this brings tears to my eyes...tears of joy. I like the phrase "Niagara of liberal angst." If only Ted Kennedy and Barbara Boxer could see their way into moving to Canada...over the falls in a barrel.

Some in U.S. voting with their feet

By Rick Lyman The New York Times Monday, February 7, 2005
VANCOUVER, British Columbia

Christopher Key knows exactly what he would be giving up if he left Bellingham, Washington.

"It's the sort of place Norman Rockwell would paint, where everyone watches out for everyone else and we have block parties every year," said Key, a 56-year-old Vietnam War veteran and former magazine editor who lists Francis Scott Key, who wrote "The Star-Spangled Banner," among his ancestors. But leave it he intends to do, and as soon as he can. His house is on the market, and he is busily seeking work across the border in Canada. For him, the re-election of George W. Bush was the last straw.

"I love the United States," he said as he stood on the Vancouver waterfront, staring toward the Coastal Range, which was lost in a gray shroud. "I fought for it in Vietnam. It's a wrenching decision to think about leaving. But America is turning into a country very different from the one I grew up believing in."

In the Niagara of liberal angst just after Bush's victory on Nov. 2, the Canadian government's immigration Web site reported a surge in inquiries from the United States, to about 115,000 a day from 20,000.After three months, memories of the election have begun to recede. There has been an inauguration, even a State of the Union address.

Yet immigration lawyers say that Americans are not just making inquiries and that more are pursuing a move above the 49th parallel, fed up with a country they see drifting persistently to the right and abandoning the principles of tolerance, compassion and peaceful idealism they felt once defined the nation.

America is in no danger of emptying out. But even a small loss of population, many from a deep sense of political despair, is a significant event in the life of a nation that thinks of itself as a place to escape to. Firm numbers on potential immigrants are elusive."The number of U.S. citizens who are actually submitting Canadian immigration papers and making concrete plans is about three or four times higher than normal," said Linda Mark, an immigration lawyer in Vancouver.

Other immigration lawyers in Toronto, Montreal and Halifax, Nova Scotia, said they had noticed a similar uptick, though most put the rise at closer to threefold.

"We're still not talking about a huge movement of people," said David Cohen, an immigration lawyer in Montreal. "In 2003, the last year where full statistics are available, there were something like 6,000 U.S. citizens who received permanent resident status in Canada. So even if we do go up threefold this year, we're only talking about 18,000 people."

Still, that is more than double the population of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. "For every one who reacts to the Bush victory by moving to a new country, how many others are there still in America, feeling similarly disaffected but not quite willing to take such a drastic step?" Cohen asked.

Melanie Redman, 30, assistant director of the Epilepsy Foundation in Seattle, said she had put her Volvo up for sale and hopes to be living in Toronto by the summer. She and her Canadian boyfriend, a Web site designer for Canadian nonprofit companies, had been planning to move to New York, but after Nov.2, they decided on Canada instead."I'm doing it," she said.


"I don't want to participate in what this administration is doing here and around the world. Under Bush, the U.S. seems to be leading the pack as the world spirals down."

Redman intends to apply for a conjugal visa, which can be easier to get than the skilled worker visa that most Americans require. To do so, she must prove she and her boyfriend have had a relationship for at least a year, so she has collected supporting paperwork, like love letters, to present to the Canadian government.

"I'm originally from a poor, lead-mining town in Missouri, and I know a lot of the people there don't understand why I'm doing this," she said. "Even my family is pretty disappointed. And the fact is, it makes me pretty sad, too. But I just can't bear to pay taxes in the United States right now."